Bush is one of my favorite people, I think it is to do with the fact that he is so human. Despite, or more accurately, because of his failings. There is nothing pretentious about him, even his pretence advertises its presence. Bush is not devious, can never be- his deviousness comes out open. And he never tries to come across as an intellectual, we understand that he can never be. He has a way with words, but they have no spin- he is like Anil Kumble on a roll, it is his straighter ones that hit the stump.
His gaffes have a certain charm- remember his 'authoritarian voice'?- and an aura of truth. Bush is a prankster who wants people to spot his pranks. I think he will be terribly disappointed if people do not laugh at him, and he is, in my eyes, seriously sad that they are not laughing with him. Bush is not someone who belongs anywhere. He has his own voice, and his own way. All he asks is, "Notice me. I am not much, but I am good at what I do."
Bush confessed that on his first day home, "...he kicked back on the couch and hollered, “Baby, free at last!” To which Laura responded, “‘Yeah, you’re free to take out the trash. Consider it your new domestic policy agenda.’”
And
"Onstage in Calgary, Bush played up his winning down-to-earthness with a story about taking a trip to his local hardware store, where the owner, Kyle Walters, offered him a job as a “greeter.” (“He’d be lucky to get a job as a casino greeter,” opines Bill Maher.)
“And a guy in there says to me, ‘Hey, did anybody ever tell you you look like George W. Bush?’” Bush said. “And I said, ‘Yeah, man, happens all the time.’ And the guy says, ‘Oh, that must make you mad!’”"
And then,
"“I’m the only former president to have both parents alive,” Bush told his audience in Calgary. “I said to my mother, ‘Mother! I can’t wait to get back to the way we used to be!’ And she said, ‘Is this gonna be like when you were young?’ And she immediately checked herself into the hospital for open-heart surgery.”
The article in Vanity Fair discusses what the legacy of Bush would be: what his post-presidency life would be: would he take a leaf out of the pages of his predecessors-
"Hayes, for example, worked tirelessly to provide education for free blacks; Hoover devoted himself to food relief worldwide; and Nixon made the miraculous morph from “crook” to, in biographer Stephen Ambrose’s words, a “senior statesman above the fray.”"
I don't think any of that would suit Bush. He is great at role-playing, and brings a certain perceptive intelligence into the deployment of language, he wants to be liked, he asks to be laughed at- he would do great as an actor.
Should he do that, his legacy as an actor would obliterate the history of his presidency.
But I don't think he is worrying about all that. He is not insane with it. Vanity Fair notes that,
"...Bush told the crowd in Calgary, “Life is good.” He said he feels no regret for any of the decisions he made as president: “If you’re a leader, you have to have principles that are inviolate, and make tough calls.”"
Life is good, yes, if you can say that at the end of your days, whether you succeeded in anything you did or failed in everything you tried your hands at, your life is a worthy one- as good as any.