Saturday, November 15, 2008

You don't have to be patriotic to understand India


India is a dichotomy, if I can put it that way. It is a land of contrasts. It gives you opportunities; it also robs you of opportunities. It has people dying of starvation; it also has people who throw millions on food and sending most of it sent to waste bins. When I look at India emotionally I am hit by anguish. When this becomes the way of life I either get alienated or overly critical.

We are in a materialistic world. Most of the people want to dominate their way into things, be it individuals, groups, societies or nations. You can’t escape this fact nor can you afford to be lax. It's all right and sounds great to talk about unifying people and fighting for the cause the great humanity. But then to walk the talk you must have strong legs.

We need to develop and grow. These are two different things. I am a strong critic of growth oriented policies when the economic development is in shambles. But then development cannot take place in the absence of growth. This is the situation that most of the developing economies will find themselves in. They got to strike a balance between development and growth for without development growth cannot be sustained.

When our children die of malnutrition, we send rockets to space, play commonwealth games and fete medalists with millions. That’s contradiction but inevitable for development cannot take place without growth. Our space research and exploration is now yielding return in dollars and is expected to grow well. Games bring lot of dollars through global sponsors, tourism and boost in local trade. When you lay foundations, for example 1982 Asian games, you incur loss. Take a shipping company or a mining company where investments are poured in for years and years before they see their money coming back. Not all investments make money on day 1.

We talk about problems. In fact no other citizen can match an Indian when it comes to highlighting the problems of one’s country. There is no denial here, nor one is blind folded. I see problems and I accept most of them are deep rooted. But then in what way any of these problems can be set right by abandoning space exploration or for that matter by not celebrating an achievement like Chandrayaan? India’s problems are more to do with men than materials. Not that India lack resources, it lacks good polity. India’s problems are structural and systemic. Money alone cannot solve these problems. India is not short of money or resources but short on moral grounds and that it is not just restricted to politicians.

Let us not allow emotions to blind our reason. Let us not allow media to dictate our reason. Let’s us not piggyback on India’s problems for that would mean we will never get down on the ground to solve them. Let’s understand our problems and also understand our challenges. Let us not allow under achievements rob our joy of achievements. Let us praise and criticize. Let us understand India, the land of contradictions.

To understand India you don’t have to be patriotic. In fact less patriotic you are better it will be as your emotions won’t blind you


On the topic of what is a third world, Soulberry has written an excellent piece on it. I will remove the survey on what is a third world tomorrow morning, as there is no point in trying to mock or match some one who do not know what it is. In fact even I didn't know what it is? Please take the link to read SB's article at TCWJ.

9 comments:

  1. For me, taking under-achievements emotionally/ being too patriotic will only steal away the hopes about the future of our nation; it makes me feel distressed. Take it light (not to under-value things, but only to move on to what is next) and you can think more clearly.

    At one stage, I think the best strategy for the weak-hearted like me is to focus more on the development of the self and our surroundings of a limited radius, of course, only in a fair way. Done in a reasonable way, it would contribute to the well being of the nation. Whether you are patriotic or not, it contributes to the nation.

    Soulberry’s post is a mature one. Of course we all should be proud of being in this ‘third-world’!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bala development of a nation is closely linked to the development of our selves. It is also quite similar, for there are two aspects to it, - development within and that without.

    We constantly seek to expand ourselves (not in a physical sense though many of us do it!) beyond previous limits, at the same time we seek to strenthen what we have..our insides.

    Each must complement the other for actual benefit.

    If there is only outward growth without concurrent internal development, the rubber-band will snap...we, or our country, will be too stretched out and imbalanced.

    Likewise, if we are all inwardly strengthening without any outwardly interst, we are merely a hyperdense deadweight. Static and unlearning.

    Like the forces of attraction between molecules or ions...he two developments keep playing on each other as checks and balances. As longas they are in harmony, there is coherent, constructive momevent and direction. The molecule remains stable.

    Our problems are there on all fronts just as for others...there is not a soul in this world without problems. Our character defines how and what we'll do with them....the character of the nation comes from us.

    If we, and I mean it, we, each one of us isn't afraid to be considerate of his fellow countryman, then we could see some progress in our own internal development.

    What are you willing to sacrifice for your country, and how much? Sacrifice as a considered choice? I am not foolish enough to live in utopia, there fore I lay the percentages...if the majority of us are able to up our contribution to our country (i don't mean money) even by 10% it will have a profound effect.

    But first of all we must train to be able to think of such altruistic things on the hunt for our daily rice and roti.The day we can do that and up it by 10 % in our lifetime, the country will be in good hands and progress vigorously from within and outwards.

    Thanks for the link and kind words Bala. I just felt Hayden had was probably thinking how smart he was when he was actually being such a fool as to reveal himslef so nakedly. Actually felt sorry for Hayden :) And proves again that you could be Alaskan or Outback dumb and yet be a success! It's actauully an inspiration for more worthy folk to hone whatever skills they have!

    ReplyDelete
  3. For me, taking under-achievements emotionally/ being too patriotic will only steal away the hopes about the future of our nation; it makes me feel distressed. Take it light (not to under-value things, but only to move on to what is next) and you can think more clearly.

    Well said. I agree with you. Emotions don't solve your problems. Reason will. We can't keep pointing fingers at all directions and say why you need this or that? As you also rightly put it change at the individual level is the need of the hour before saying India is ****.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's true SB. It is we who make the nation and it's character. If we are rich in thinking, self disciplined and contributing, so will the country. In some way the country, society and a group mirrors its members.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great post, Balajhi, and great responses from SB and Siva.

    I have my own reservations about all this, but I hope they don't stop me from appreciating when others are being reasonable and mature.

    Thanks to you all, I am learning a lot from you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Bas. I learn a lot from you. And am sure our disagreements won't come in the way of learning and appreciating.

    We accept the other person's right to agree / disagree

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't know whether I am right, but my feeling is, in India we want the nation to do for us and take care of itself. I don't know whether this is a problem of democracy or the due to the deep rooted inequality, in money, social status etc.

    We need to develop and for that we need growth. But over reliance growth without development will create more inequality.

    SB, I was watching the interview of Union health minister, Anbumani Ramadoss on CNBC, this afternoon. He wants to be remembered for his initiatives on the front of National rural health mission than for tobacco, alchohol and venugopal. I don't know how much of credit the minister deserves but irrespective of that the statistics he doled out are damn impressive. I don't think he can lie on camera. Even if half of what he said was true then the development taking place on the healthcare front is amazing. It seems NHRM has received accolades from world bodies like UN and WHO for its reach, scale and mission. SB I look forward to your comments on this.

    After reading your article, I too felt sorry for Hayden.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was surprised to hear him bas. But then we have to hear from someone who is in the field.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The one good thing he has done is actually tobacco. I don't know why he wouldn't like to be remembered for it. Public spaces are better for it.

    The sad thing is everybody is waiting for Ramdoss to move one before the tobacco business of selling and using can bounceback again.

    I don't know about alcohol and rural health. If they have been as significant.

    ReplyDelete