Saturday, August 16, 2008

Shakespeare Shows the Way




May be we could have avoided this, but since we have started to talk about this, i would like to make my own post about this porn topic.

First let me make this claim: I don't see porn. Once or twice when I had the chance to watch it, I became terribly uneasy. I couldn't sit and watch it. It is a psychology thing, i think. May be something is wrong with me... I am not normal that way.

And I place people who watch porn on the lower levels of my moral scale.

So I have put my prejudice on board.

If you ask me what I have got against porn, I am likely to get high and mighty and state that the viewing of porn puts you in a state of mind where you see all women as sex-objects. Their feelings are relegated to the background, and the him-her relationship is reduced to the level of being mere bodies.

But I can see how porn can act like a tranquiliser, if not as an aphrodisiac. People who are pained by their urges, could turn to porn and find vicarious satisfaction of their needs.

About the fears of civil society, that the viewing of porn is something evil, and would inspire us to commit vile deeds, I am not impressed. Some people would get worse, but most would not. Even religion makes fanatics and fundamentalists of some, but we don't go all the way and say all religions are bad.

Wrong comparison? May be.

But recently I read an article, which says porn is not likely to make maniacs of us. It is anecdotal, has no statistics, but it has a view point.I think it is good for that reason. The article is 'The Porn Myth', By Naomi Wolf.

The points she makes are these:

i. If you see more and more porn, you are likely to see fewer and fewer women as porn-worthy. It puts you off real women. Real naked women are just bad porn.

ii. Junk food makes you obese, right? The more junk you take, the more you need to take. If your appetite is stimulated by poor-quality material, you need more if you want to be filled up. Porn, instead of bringing together people, turns them away from one another. They are not able to face each other, erotically, without the disturbing, and subverting, images of porn. Men who view porn are less inspired to move by the company of real women.

iii. The reason why this happens is this, she says: Greater supply of the stimulant equals diminished capacity. Much like everything else which gives us pleasure, pornography works in the most basic of ways on the brain: It is Pavlovian. If sexual pleasure is associated in your mind with the touch and smell of your wife, that is what will turn you on. Bit if you associated that with a stream of images of your TV/PC, that is what will turn you all. Your pleasure might be enhanced by porn, but it dilutes your motivation to perform.


iv. The more it is a mystery, and a game between two people, the more it is likely to be meaningful and fulfilling, she says. Otherwise it becomes just an urge you want to get rid off, quickly, very quickly.

So, if any of you enjoy porn, my advice is, don't.

Instead, go and write poetry:- however bad, it is more likely to set you aflame.

After all, it is the poets who go after and get the beautiful girls, right, not the peeping toms.

12 comments:

  1. I'm not sure whether the law prohibits watching prono at home, definitely it shouldn't. Selling it illegally, that is, to minors, or using it in 'unlawful' ways (say, to extract money) is illegal. It is the same as owning a knife at home. Can the police come in to my home and say that I possessed a knife which 'could' be used to kill someone?! porno arrest is just as absurd.

    Watching porno? personally for me, I find it disgusting, after watching a highly acclaimed one. But I do think that people should be given the previlege to 'choose' to see it as long as it is within their private space, be it home or wherever. I find it go well with Taliban and the likes (see cucumber Laws http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1043409/Severe-Islamic-law-banned-suggestive-cucumbers-cost-Al-Qaeda-public-support-Iraq.html, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/2538545/Al-Qaeda-in-Iraq-alienated-by-cucumber-laws-and-brutality.html)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I meant, "I find that the porno ban/ arrest find it go well with Taliban and the likes".

    ReplyDelete
  3. I totally agree with you.

    It is the producers and distributors the police need to go after, though without the customers the men who make the money won't be in the business.

    I personally feel that people here at Tamil Nadu are intolerant of divergent mores/views.

    I really don't know what is so bad about democratic choices. Remember the Khusboo imbroglio? I think she is still attending the court for her statement...

    It is a pity that we have come to subscribe with this attitude.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is one fundamental error those who argue for propagation of porn make....they presume that the kids who will nevitably watch them have are doing so with a mature mind. Not that grown-ups who watch have mature minds per se.

    Porn is no god for young developing minds. Like it or not, that's a fact when applied to general population. Supporters may give anecdotal evidence that X or Y wasn't affected by porn as a child, maybe even prospered, but 99% of the remaining are affected.

    Rather than porn, I am more in favour of encouraging healthy interaction between both sexes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Siva

    When porn is banned, automatically porn watching is also illegal. This is my theory why Porn is banned and why the ban should continue.

    Porn is a double edged sword. It could be an effective outlet but at the same time it could be the door opening up for adventurism. Porn certainly alters one's idea about sex. What you see in a blue film is not what happens in reality. I don't want to bring in any graphic thoughts here but hope you understand the messsage.

    Going to a prostitute is totally different from watching porn. In the first one satiates one's urge and in the second one fuels the urge further. This breaks the myth that porn watching could be an effective outlet. Porn watching can be psychologically damaging if it catches on as a habit.

    I am certainly not for legalising porn. At the same time any one watching porn must face the law. However I differ with the kind of punishment for such an unlawful act. People should be penalised not humiliated.

    It is a type of western culture to think that watching porn in a private space is ok. We certainly don't live like westerners barring few sections in urban centres. Also chances that it will corrupt young children is very high if porn watching goes unpunished and is legalised.

    As Soulberry put it we should encourage healthy interaction between both sexes. Also we need sex education not porn.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What are the limits of the healthy interaction? And who decides the limits?

    As for western culture, everything we do is western. Even toilets in the flats, these days.

    East is dead, or close to death.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As long as you do not hurt yourself and the other in any way, it is a healthy interaction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You set your own limits according to those basic guiding principles.

    It's a bit like killing...you know it is wrong to pick up a knife and kill the man standing next to you at the bus stop, you know that it is wrong but yet you have to do to save yourself or another when someone is mortally attacking you...maybe an armed bandit with a long sharp sword about to slice your head off the trunk, or maybe the soldier from the other side who has lined you up in his beads and is just contracting the muscled of his trigger finger...you know it is wrong to kill per se, but you know you have to kill now and not at the bust stop.

    Limits are something like that...if you hurt someone with your words and actions...you have trespassed boundaries of another; if you have hurt yourself, you have trespassed the boundaries conceded to you by your own self.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would like to take up the question of limits later.

    Thanks for giving us your well-deliberated views.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Permission or restriction of any material that satisfy your any of the senses depends on its effect on you or on others and its capacity to get you addicted to it.

    Like drug/liquor this porn is addictable and will lead one to his misery limited to the available opportunities and the intensity to create one.

    Porn material available aplenty and daring questions as whether to allow them legally or not are all highly regrettable and objectionable.

    The chances of porn material perverting a lad with good family upbringing are highly remote. But the damage a fallable boy can inflict on the society is large. We must understand that not all the arrested lads are born porn watchers. They are attracted by their colleagues or neighbors who were already attracted by their friends. This is a chain.

    How could a thing like this is bad for society? In a way this creates demand and is fed with the generated supply. This could be evident from the news items that appeared in a week's time where 5 or 6 murders were reported and the causes were infidelity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think I am re-opening the topic which we have beaten to death already, but I can't resist this.

    Kafka is one of my favourite writers. So it came as a shock to me, but it was no surprise really, to read that Kafka subscribed to pornographic magazines. His reading seems to have had no effect on his writing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Watching pornography, especially on print may not have an effect on a person. Generally porn impacts the younger lot who are driven by the unknown.

    ReplyDelete