"I took the ancient notion that a woman’s virginity is priceless and used it as a vehicle for capitalism."

I am sure you've heard about Natalie Dylan, who is auctioning her virginity and has received a bid for $3.6 million. In a blog at Daily Beast , she says she is doing it not for money, but in the interests of science. 

"When I put my virginity up for auction in September, it was in part a sociological experiment—I wanted to study the public's response," she writes. Natalie Dylan is qualified to do the experiment- she has Bachelor’s Degree in Women’s Studies, and plans to get a Masters Degree program in Marriage and Family Therapy.

She states in that blog, "Deflowering is historically oppressive", and,"... idealized virginity is just a tool to keep women in their place. But then I realized something else: if virginity is considered that valuable, what’s to stop me from benefiting from that?"

"For me, valuing virginity as sacred is simply not a concept I could embrace. But valuing virginity monetarily—now that’s a concept I could definitely get behind"

Yes, all that is right, but is this just a part of a sociological experiment, or is she beddable? If she is not, then I expect that man who bid $3.6 million to sue her for breach of promise.