I happened to read this article and I' am glad that I read it because I think that sometimes my provincial patriotism for Tamil (out of respect and out of questions) out grows than that of my not so sure - Indian Patriotism!. Sometimes I would feel guilty of very little experience to have separatist feelings, but reading this article helps soothe my mind and I am happy that one great person has had the exact foresight into what would happen now though w.r.t Bengalism, I can easily relate it to me myself now...
"More than 80 years ago, in 1920, Pramatha Chaudhuri wrote an article titled "Bengali Patriotism". It appeared in the famous Bengali monthly, Sabuj Patra (Green Leaves), which he edited. Chaudhuri described the various people of India as different "nations" entitled to national self determination. According to him the possibility of harmony and co-operation was much more, if this separateness was recognised rather than denied. This is shortened version of an English translation which appeared in September 1982 in the Indian magazine Facets, as a contribution to a rational debate on the question: "Whither India?" And that was 22 years ago! Pramatha Chauduri's writing remains essential reading today for those who are concerned to secure and protect the unity that is India.
"To be united due to outside pressure and to unite through mutual regard are not the same. Just as there is a difference between the getting together of five convicts in a jail and between five free men, so the Congress union of the various nations of India and tomorrow's link between the peoples of a free country will be very different. Indian patriotism will then be built on the foundation of provincial patriotism, not just in words but in reality."
You have accused me of "Bengali patriotism"....
You have accused me of "Bengali patriotism". I feel bound to reply. If it is a crime for a Bengali to harbour and encourage Bengali patriotism in his mind, then I am guilty. But I ask you: what other patriotism do you expect from a Bengali writer?
The fact that I do not write in English should indicate that non Bengali patriotism does not sway my mind. If I had to make patriotic speeches in a language of no part of India, then I would have to justify that patriotism by saying that it does not relate to any special part of India but that it means love for India as a whole. In a language learnt by rote you can only express ideas learnt by heart. The proof of that is constantly visible in our conferences and congresses. In those meetings, our 'by heart' people are the leaders as well as the performers.
However, just as it is difficult to ask for an explanation about love, so also it is difficult to give such an explanation - whether the object of one's love be a person or a nation. It is better to say that in this case, when one says love for one's country, it is really love for one's people.
To love a country means to love its people
To love a country means to love its people because human beings love other human beings. If there is someone who loves, not humans but the soil, then we can conclude that he is no human but a slab of inanimate matter. Science after all, has discovered a law under which matter attracts matter inexorably and blindly.
But let us forget this irrelevant crap. The real truth is that it is unfair to ask anyone for an explanation for loving one's own people because such love is considered to be a weakness of the mind. If even Arujna could have been weak enough to have affection for his own people, then why should it be strange for small persons like us to have the same? A Bengali is kin to another Bengali because, in the field of mind, the link of language is like a link of blood. So all Bengali's have a tie with each other; it would be odd if they did not.
I have become a neo Indian alias a non Indian
Though I was born in Bengal, in a Bengali home, yet I am not a pure Bengali. Having lived under total British rule, having been to schools and colleges dominated by English from age five to twenty five, I have become a neo Indian alias a non Indian, that is to say I am the same caste as the Congress wallahs. I have drunk a lot of the heady wine of politics and I have not yet been able to rid myself fully of its effects. Right till today, I must say, that I judge the past, present and future of India, if not quite at the prodding of that wine, then at least through the spectacles of that tipsiness. So if I have anything to say on provincial patriotism from the perspective of Indian politics, I shall do so.
Bengali self determination
At the root of Bengali patriotism is the sense of distinctiveness of the Bengali people. According to the doctrine of self determination of nations, Bengali patriotism has a special significance. We are, first, a special nation and we are also a small nation so the enemy of our self determination is Indian imperialism - and the last war (1914-18) has shown that imperialism is an evil thing, be it foreign or domestic. British imperialism had an international wing, the German variety was purely domestic and now it is clear, as in an open book, that it is this internal imperialism in Germany which was responsible for its moral, spiritual and political degeneration.
It is not a bad thing to try and weld many into one but to jumble them all up is dangerous, because the only way we can do that is by force. If you say that this does not apply to India, the reply is that if self determination is not suited to us, then it is not suited at all to Europe. No people in Europe are as different, one from another, as our people. There is not that much difference between England and Holland as there is between Madras and Bengal. Even France and Germany are not that far apart. If some of our politicians shudder at the mention of provincial patriotism, it is because their beliefs smack of narrow national selfishness.
The uniformity of slaves and the unity of free men
If you ask why this simple truth is not self evident to all, the answer is: because of present circumstances. The whole of India is now under British rule, so no province has political independence. Therefore, the main link between us, is the link of our bondage and no province can cut through this subjugation by its own efforts and actions. In this situation the political dilemma is the same for us all. That dilemma is how to transform this subjugation into independence. So today, we are obliged to tell the 30 crores of Indians, "Unite and Organise".
But, people will realise the value of provincial patriotism the moment they attain independence. The bond of subjugation will disintegrate at the touch of freedom. Under the press of domination, slaves usually become uniform but independent people will cultivate their heritage and express their individuality. Then the various nations of India will not try to merge, they will however, try to establish a unity among themselves. There will be a difference as wide as between heaven and hell between that unity and the Congress unity of today.
To be united due to outside pressure and to unite through mutual regard are not the same. Just as there is a difference between the getting together of five convicts in a jail and between five free men, so the Congress union of the various nations of India and tomorrow's link between the peoples of a free country will be very different. Indian patriotism will then be built on the foundation of provincial patriotism, not just in words but in reality.
Politics of the bird world
As children, we read in the Hitopodesa that at night birds from all directions would gather on a shimul tree on the banks of the Godavari. Why? To cackle for a while and then go off to sleep. Cackle in this context means to discuss the politics of the birdworld.
We, too, in this dark, night time of India's history go to the Congress meet to cackle for three or four days and then snore. We can cackle together because, thanks to the education conferred by the British, we all have the same dialect. I am not saying that this dialect is all that our lips utter or our minds. All I want to suggest is that behind the Congress patriotism, there is only one kind of mind and that mind is bred on English text books. We all have that kind of mind, but under it is the mind which is individual for all nations and different from nation to nation. And our civilisation will emerge from the depth of that mind.
Each Indian nation must "Know Thyself"
Because of our foreign education, it has become easy to forget that truth and that is why each Indian nation must be told "Know Thyself" and that is where provincial patriotism has its value. We must be prepared to serve the interests of our own people.
Before going further, we must make clear the meaning of the word "self interest". The moment we hear of the nationalism of one people and react by fearing that it is hostile to the nationalism of others, we are using the word nationalism in its most crude material sense, because men fight and squabble over food and property while things of the mind are not any people's private property. When any people decide to stop the exchange of things of the mind with another nation, then it must be concluded that they are dyed in the wool materialists because they think that, like matter, the mind is also circumscribed by boundaries.
Men may be the same in a broad sense but just as their physical characteristics differ so do their mental character. Just as individual differs from individual in temperament and strength, nations too have the same differences. And whether individual or nation the progress of each is to develop that distinctiveness because in that effort is happiness and freedom.
I concede that European education has exerted influence on the educated Indian everywhere. Our political opinions are, from A to Z completely European. Every knows that. That our political soul is being fashioned by Europe nobody denies - nobody that is, except the professional nationalist politician.
Those who have nothing to protect do not need independence
But for any nation to lose its true nature and try to be independent is stupidity. When Indians become independent, they will not allow people from one province to meddle with the education of another province. Every conscious nation has a special national ideal and it arranges education according to that ideal. Those who have nothing of their own or who do not want to protect or develop individuality do not need independence; even the word is meaningless for them.
But there is a little difference even between our Bengali book fed minds and the book fed minds of the rest of India. Our political mind is also not quite on all fours with the political minds of other provinces. Remember, man's political mind is not outside his total mind and is not unconnected with it. Ofcourse there are some Congress wallahs who do not admit this. If they did, then there would not have been in their ranks that freaky creature, the tikiwala democrat.
Democratic swaraj needs a change of attitude. That our young people are aware of this need for change is plain to me from my conversations. Not to consider humans as humans, to keep most of the country's people and its women in slavery, while citing shastras as an excuse - most Bengalis have understood that such an outlook is both shameful and laughable.
But, this outlook has not yet reached our newspapers and our public platforms, because it is not really feasible to carry on a war against ourselves. It is not possible to bombinate publicly against what we in private are ashamed of. We beat drums only about one thing - our spiritual superiority. Partly by education and partly by experience we have got to know our nature and our strength. To know one's faults is also part of self knowledge and because we know about ourselves, we want to build our future national life on that knowledge.
It is not easy for a people to cut free from age old beliefs and gain new life and strength. The way to gain fulfillment in this new way is not through political circuses, for momentary excitement is always followed by lasting lassitude. National wealth is built upon national achievements. It may be difficult for men to give up things such as titles or a law practice but far more difficult is it to achieve something. It is easy to run away from life, much more difficult to fight and overcome. Since the fight is eternal there is not a moment of respite.
Self sacrifice cannot be the ideal of any nation...
As you can see I am giving proof of my own rajasic mind. On the one hand I was born in a Vedic, Tantric society then again I have grown up in a materialistic European atmosphere so you cannot expect anything else from me. I do not know if the rajasic mind is inferior to the satvic mind but it is certainly superior to the tamasic mind. Of that I have no doubt. Nor do I doubt that what in our country now goes by the name of satvic is in reality tamasic. At their root is ignorance and indifference, in one word paralysis of the mind.
I like to believe that my mind is the Bengali mind of this age. If that is so, then it is not difficult to figure out the ideals of Bengali nationalism. It cannot be our ideal to clothe all Indians in langotis. If the Bengali has one passionate prayer it is this: Do not make me a scholar, a man of fame, or wealthy; give me beauty, success and victory over the enemy. But this is not a prayer to any outside force but to one's own internal strength.
Because we have discovered the truth that knowledge, fame, riches - all these can be earned through inner strength. If any body says "but there is nothing about self sacrifice in this ideal" then my reply is: self sacrifice cannot be the ideal of any nation, the only possible national ideal is self realisation. And the only path to it is for a multitude of people to take the vow of self realisation.
My final word is this: the country that I most deeply love is not today's Bengal, nor the Bengal of the past but the future Bengal, the Bengal that we build. That is why my Bengali patriotism is not ranged against today's Indian patriotism. If any nationalism is built on hatred, the result of that nationalism can be only destruction not only of others but of one self as well. Whosoever has eyes must have seen this truth in the last European war.
Courtesy: www.tamilnation.org
http://www.tamilnation.org/intframe/india/20chauduri.htm
I don't want to make any comments in haste, but this could be interesting:
ReplyDelete"The study shows that perceiving others in pain activates a part of the brain associated with empathy and emotion more if the observer and the observed are the same race. The findings may show that unconscious prejudices against outside groups exist at a basic level.
The study confirms an in-group bias in empathic feelings, something that has long been known but never before confirmed by neuroimaging technology."
-Science Daily"
I think there is more to survival instinct that logic in who we like/love and who we don't. Prejudice in favour of similar people is inbuilt, it seems, and we have to work hard to overcome it.
More discussion on this is welcome.
We have to grow out of our prejudices and bias as we grow up. It's true that we share the pain of people who are close to us (genetically / culturally) than people who are away from it. But then pain is pain irrespective of who has it. If we can understand the pain of a Tamil then we can surely understand the pain of others (be they from other cultures or other nations).
ReplyDeleteInterestingly people of a group or sect are called upon to show their strength only to denounce and protest while the same group is forgotten when there is a loot. People call others to share pain not the gain. When that is the case we may as well share the pain of all as no one is different when it comes to gain. Just a thought.
We are all prejudiced; but some of us are able to keep it at arms length and get on with our life. Others justify it with logic, that is the only difference.
ReplyDeleteI think the time for nation-building is past- in the globalised economy in which we find ourselves today, there is no sense in claiming total sovereignty- when jobs are lost in US, we are affected in India.
The best thing to do is to get on our individual life, and not bother anyone with our prejudices in the name of race, language, religion, caste, ideology and things like that.
Regards,
Baskar
It is good to think of people forgetting everything and getting into a Global Citizen tag... but again the whole process of union among people who share the same interests, jobs, god, geography, etc will happen no matter what... won't it? - maybe with more updation in terms of technology and scientific reasoning capabilities...
ReplyDeleteIt will never happen that way, no matter what the technology is, except if you wire every brain together and feed it the same information...
ReplyDeleteWe will always be prejudiced and bigoted, but in a globalised world we will find it difficult to act on our impulses. It is not perfect now, but it will get to be that way.
The most important thing here is access to information and freedom of speech- if we have them, and can have open discussions about everything- then injustice becomes very difficult to justify.
At least that is my thought.
No, I am not attempting to get into a Global Citizen Tag. No certainly not.
ReplyDeleteI only say, look at yourself, feel the human you are. When you can appreciate your 'SELF' you can as well appreciate other SELF'S. It doesn't vary much but for the prejudices and bigotry. We cannot erase them in one generation, in fact we may never be able to do so in our life time. As Baskar says they may remain with us.
As long as we appreciate that the difference in self feeling is due to prejudices and bigotry that we carry we will then surely be more accommodating and tolerant. After all prejudices have their roots in perceptions that are formed with other set of prejudices. It's a vicious cycle.
What you see and understand depends on from where you see. Your angle leads to your perception. No one can claim to be seeing things from the right angle. People can at best claim that their's is the popular angle.
So everyone's perception has a place in this world. We may disagree but that should not foment anger and hatred. If there is a pain, it is pain, irrespective of who suffers from it. Closer we are to understanding that pain with a single scale more humane we are. That's my point and I rest my case